Owned Solar Delivers a Significant Price Premium
Homeowners who invested in rooftop solar panels are seeing a substantial return at resale, according to a new study by SolarInsure that analyzed more than 5,000 home transactions. The research found that homes with owned solar panel systems sold for 5 to 10 percent more than comparable properties without solar installations, translating to a price premium of $39,500 to $79,000 depending on the home's value.
The study examined 2,350 home sales with owned rooftop solar systems, 1,790 sales with third-party solar leases or power purchase agreements, and 860 sales of homes without any solar installation. All properties were single-family residences in major California markets, providing a controlled comparison across similar housing stock and climate conditions.
"Buyers demonstrate demand for long-term energy savings and stability when purchasing homes with owned solar systems," said Ara Agopian of SolarInsure. The finding confirms what many in the solar industry have long argued: that solar panels are not just an energy-saving investment but a genuine home improvement that increases property value.
The Ownership Premium vs. the Lease Discount
The study's most striking finding may be the sharp divide between owned and leased solar systems. While homes with owned panels commanded significant premiums, properties with third-party-owned solar installations, either leases or power purchase agreements, did not show a consistent increase in resale value. In some cases, leased systems may even create complications during the sale process.
The divergence makes economic sense. When a homeowner owns their solar system outright, the buyer inherits a valuable asset that will produce free electricity for years or decades with minimal maintenance. When the system is leased, the buyer inherits an obligation: monthly lease payments and a contract with a third-party solar company that may run for 20 years or more. Some buyers view this as a liability rather than an asset, potentially complicating or even derailing transactions.
This finding has practical implications for homeowners considering solar installation. While leasing or entering a power purchase agreement reduces the upfront cost barrier, it appears to sacrifice the long-term property value benefit that makes solar a compelling investment. For homeowners who can afford the initial investment or who finance the purchase through a solar loan, outright ownership delivers superior returns both through energy savings and home value appreciation.







