The direction of the energy transition is holding, but the path is getting messier
North America’s energy transition is still moving forward, but it is entering a more complicated phase in which politics and execution matter as much as technology costs. That is the central message of Energy Monitor’s review of GlobalData’s North America Energy Transition 2026 outlook. The report argues that the broad economic case for renewables remains intact, yet the region’s trajectory is becoming harder to predict as policy volatility and geopolitical conflict complicate deployment.
That distinction is important. For much of the past decade, the energy transition was often framed as a cost story. Solar got cheaper, storage improved, wind scaled, and the expectation was that adoption would accelerate on those economics alone. The new outlook suggests that phase is over. Technology and economics still matter, but the decisive constraints now involve permitting, grids, industrial capacity, and political commitment.
Renewables are still growing
Despite the turbulence, the outlook still projects substantial growth. Renewables are expected to rise from 32 percent of power generation in 2025 to 43 percent by 2035 across North America. Solar alone is projected to reach 19 percent. On the capacity side, renewables are expected to move from 42 percent to 58 percent over the same period.
Those are meaningful gains, and they show the transition has not stalled. But the report also places North America in a weaker comparative position than the global trend. Worldwide, renewables are expected to account for around 69 percent of capacity by 2035. The implication is not only that North America may decarbonize more slowly. It is that regions that move faster on grids, supply chains, and electrification could also gain an industrial edge.
That competitive framing marks a shift from older debates that treated the transition mainly as a climate target. Increasingly, speed of execution is also being read as a measure of economic capability.



