A new H5N1 genotype surged across migratory flyways
A study published online in Nature Medicine on April 15, 2026 reports that a newly classified high-pathogenicity avian influenza genotype, D1.1, expanded rapidly in wild birds across North America during the 2024 migratory season. The paper describes the virus as a reassortant that was first detected in September 2024 and then tracked through active and passive surveillance programs in Canada and the United States.
The central finding is not merely that H5N1 remained present in wild bird populations, but that a distinct genotype appears to have spread quickly enough to displace earlier A(H5) lineages across several flyways. That matters because migratory flyways are the channels through which avian influenza can move over long distances, cross jurisdictions, and repeatedly reseed outbreaks in new places.
By tying genomic surveillance to the seasonal movement of wild birds, the study adds a sharper picture of how a specific viral lineage can go from emergence to broad geographic reach in a short period. It also shows how much depends on maintaining surveillance systems that can detect those shifts before they become visible in livestock or human case counts.
What the researchers reported
According to the abstract supplied with the candidate, highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses entered North America in late 2021 and then reassorted rapidly with local avian influenza viruses. The newly observed D1.1 genotype was detected in September 2024. Using surveillance data from across Canada and the US, the researchers followed its emergence and spread during the fall migration.
The study says phylodynamic analysis showed that D1.1 viruses formed a monophyletic group. In practical terms, that supports the idea that the viruses tracked in the surveillance network belonged to a coherent, newly expanded lineage rather than a loose collection of unrelated detections. The paper further states that D1.1 displaced earlier A(H5) genotypes across several flyways, underscoring that this was not a marginal event at the edges of the surveillance map.
The source text also links the expansion of D1.1 with detections in other hosts, including 17 human cases, four of which were severe or fatal. At the same time, the abstract notes that the mammalian-adaptive markers found in human cases were not detected in the wild-bird viruses analyzed in the study. That distinction is important: it suggests the surveillance findings in wild birds did not directly show the same adaptive signatures reported in the human cases.







